Compare the processes used to change the Army during the post-Vietnam timeframe to the processes used today. How did the Army decide what strategic changes needed to take place?

Processes used to change the Army during the post-Vietnam timeframe

You will compare the processes used to change the Army during the post-Vietnam timeframe to the processes used today.

Use the Bradley fighting vehicle to conduct the comparison. JCIDS, DAS, PPBE, TAA, TAP, etc. did not exist during the post-Vietnam era. So how did the Army make decisions and how is that different than today? Why does it matter?

This is not a history paper of what happened in the past, nor is it a paper that acts like the current processes were used in the past. It is a comparative analysis.

How did the Army decide what strategic changes needed to take place? How was it different than what happens today?

What is your analysis of this difference/these differences?

Ensure you address each of the main points. You must address materiel and organizational change in your essay.

Main Points:
1. Describe how strategic guidance leads to identifying requirements and solutions to provide capabilities.
2. Develop solutions across DOTMLPF-P.
3. Explain how the Army allocates resources to support solutions.
4. Employ force integration to provide capability to combatant commanders.

Compare the processes used to change the Army during the post-Vietnam timeframe to the processes used today. How did the Army decide what strategic changes needed to take place?
Scroll to top