Critically evaluate the reasoning of the International Criminal Court in Al-Bashir Arrest Warrant Case in relation to the rules on Head of State immunity.

Subject: Public International Law

Topic of essay:

Critically evaluate the reasoning of the International Criminal Court in Al-Bashir Arrest Warrant Case in relation to the rules on Head of State immunity.

Word Limit: 6000 including OSCOLA footnotes referencing

Requirements: Bibliography at the end of essay

 

Criteria for the Law essay requested

  • A first-class mark is awarded to work of an unusually high standard;
  • The work will typically demonstrate an ability to deal confidently with relevant principles of law;
  • The work will show a capacity for independent thought (with appropriate reference to case law and statutes;
  • The work will show an ability to critically assess argument made and views expressed in the relevant literature (for example books, journals articles and parliamentary reports);
  • The discussion will show evidence that the writer has a point of view on the issue at hand. However, this will be a reasoned view which is supported by evidence, argument, or authority and will address alternative perspectives or arguments which may be raised;
  • Assessed work will contain relevant quotations from and/or references to views expressed in the relevant literature where and as appropriate in the work;
  • Points raised will be arranged in a logically coherent manner;
  • Points raised will be made succinctly
Critically evaluate the reasoning of the International Criminal Court in Al-Bashir Arrest Warrant Case in relation to the rules on Head of State immunity.
Scroll to top