Why should the president be allowed to use “signing statements” and “executive orders” to expand and define his enforcement authority under a law?

it is 1 essay of 7 pages where you must answer these two questions NO INTERNET ARTICLES CAN BE USED THEY MUST BE SCHOLARLY SOURCES

Q1 – Why should the president be allowed to use “signing statements” and “executive orders” to expand and define his enforcement authority under a law?

Might he use these devices to “veto” a part of a law by delimiting enforcement? Define these terms as the president might do in defending his authority as “Chief of Law Enforcement”

How did TR and Taft debate the reach of executive actions and authority, FDR ,Eisenhower, and GWBush. Which one(s) do you agree with on this subject.

Why and which president(s) ?
What is “executive privilege” and why should a president claim a need for this action?

Why should the president be allowed to use “signing statements” and “executive orders” to expand and define his enforcement authority under a law?
Scroll to top