To what extent does this statement reflect a desirable attitude to the development by judges of tort doctrine?

Choose ONE question to answer out of the two:

1. [T]he courts will not invent a new cause of action to cover types of activity which were not previously covered[.]’

Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UKHL 22,[2004] 2 AC 457, [133] (Baroness Hale)

To what extent does this statement reflect a desirable attitude to the development by judges of tort doctrine?

2. ‘Different torts aim to do fundamentally different things. Some torts are informed by a commitment to corrective justice. In other torts, the pursuit of distributive justice dominates judicial thinking. This results in tort law, as a body of doctrine, being incorrigibly incoherent.’

n.b You may draw upon doctrine from these areas of law when responding to either question:

1. Employers Liability, Nuisance

(Employers’ Liability, Vicarious Liability, Private Nuisance and Rylands and Public Nuisance)

2. Defamation and Privacy

3. Incrementalism and Intentional Tort

4. Occupiers’ liability

To what extent does this statement reflect a desirable attitude to the development by judges of tort doctrine?
Scroll to top