Briefly explain what analysis a court would use in determining whether a state law that conflicts with a federal regulation, absent federal preemption, should be held constitutional.

use the attach file to reply to the questions.

Chapter Questions

Answer the following questions using examples from the readings in Week 2 and any other sources you identify. Write in complete sentences using proper APA citation format as necessary. Answer all parts of the questions. Your response should contain a minimum of 300 words.

1. The World-Wide Volkswagen case (chapter 4) is considered an instrumental case in determining the constitutional limits of obtaining personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. Briefly explain the finding of the court in this case and how that finding relates to the concept of long-arm statutes.

2. What do the two cases presented in (chapter 5), Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Antonio Jones and 14 Penn Plaza, LLC. v. Pyett, reveal about how businesses and the Supreme Court view arbitration?

3. Briefly explain what analysis a court would use in determining whether a state law that conflicts with a federal regulation, absent federal preemption, should be held constitutional. (chapter 6)

Save your file as MGMT5413_YourName_Wk2Assignment

Briefly explain what analysis a court would use in determining whether a state law that conflicts with a federal regulation, absent federal preemption, should be held constitutional.
Scroll to top