Assignment Description: Part I Creating a Pamphlet or Web Page
To complete this portion of the assignment the DNP–NA student evaluates a mental illness or substance abuse issue that adversely affects individuals in an identified population.
The student creates a pamphlet and/or (web page) that identifies and addresses gaps in health promotion/disease prevention educational care. The completed project should include information about current recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention in the identified population. Remember there are two parts to this assignment Part 1– Creating a Pamphlet or Web Page and Part II– Peer Review.
Assignment Description: Part II Peer Review
Peer review is an important process in graduate work and affords students the opportunity to collaborate during the learning process. Each student must have their Health Promotion Project Assignment peer reviewed by a fellow classmate. Additionally, each student must peer review a fellow classmates Health Promotion Project Assignment. All students will randomly be assigned to Peer Review by
How to complete the Peer Review:
1. Provide constructive, meaningful feedback on the assignment. The following
statements are examples of NON–constructive feedback. The previous examples depict how NOT to provide constructive feedback and student will not receive credit for the peer review section of the assignment if they provide this type of feedback.
2. Provide constructive, meaningful feedback regarding the relationship between the
topic and health promotion. The following statements are examples of NON–
constructive feedback: “Great selection” “What” “Yes” “Poor quality”. The previous
examples depict how NOT to provide constructive feedback and the student will not
receive credit for the assignment if they provide this type of feedback.
3. The Peer Review process must occur to receive full credit.
Important: Course Instructors will review to assure that Peer evaluation is relevant and provides objective feedback, constructive criticism, and several recommendations for revisions with the focus on enhancing student presentations.
Tasks:
Create a health promotion pamphlet or website according to the attached rubric.
Identify and include a link (or web address) to one risk assessment tool and 2 links (or web addresses) to health promotion and prevention websites.
Complete a peer evaluation of a classmate’s health promotion project. The peer
evaluation should include strengths and weaknesses of the project, using the peer review guidelines above and the grading rubric below.
Resources:
Bickley, L. S. (2017). Bates’ guide to physical examination and history taking (12th ed).
Wolters Kluwer Hines, R.L., & Marshall, K.E., (2012). Stoelting’s anesthesia and co–
existing disease. (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier–Saunders.
Health Promotion and Prevention websites see LMS
3
ANALYTIC RUBRIC: NURS 6340
HEALTH PROMOTION PROJECT ASSIGNMENT PEER ASSESSMENT
Student: __________________ Date: _________
Criteria
Level of Achievement
Beginning 0 Excellent 1
Describes the
Pathophysiology of the
Disease
Pathophysiology of disease is not
clearly documented and/or
inaccurate.
Pathophysiology of disease is clearly
stated with precise understanding of
disease process.
Summarizes at Risk
Patients/Populations
and Statistical
Data/Prevalence
Populations at risk not
summarized and relevant
statistical data not addressed.
Populations at risk is clearly and
completely summarized with
precision and accuracy with well
supported documentation. Numerous
reports of statistical data is discussed
and analyzed for its relevance to
health promotion and disease
prevention.
Identifies and Includes
a link (or web address)
to one risk assessment
tool and 2 links (or web
addresses) to health
promotion and
prevention websites
Fails to identify and include
required links/web addresses.
Identifies and includes links/web
addresses that are relevant to the
topic, inclusive health promotion
information, and easy to navigate by
other users.
Outlines Patient
Education Strategies to
Address Gaps in Care
Content is vague and
unorganized. Project lacks
insufficient information that can
be used to educate patient
populations.
Content for patient information is
comprehensive and accurate with all
major points clearly stated and well
supported by scholarly research.
Medical jargon avoided throughout
project.
Criteria
Level of Achievement
Beginning 0 Excellent 2
Uses Conventions of
Standard U.S. English
(Spelling, Grammar,
Syntax and Logic)
Frequent errors: Spelling and
grammar; incorrect word usage;
awkward syntax; expression of
thought is obscured by
mechanics. Major problems in
sentence and/or paragraph
construction.
Spelling and grammar are
exemplary. Expression of thought is
not obscured by mechanics. Word
usage gives consistently clear and
precise meaning. Sentences and
paragraphs are well crafted and
contribute to a smooth flow of
thought.
