Critically analyze this statement. Does this reflect the current state of the law on incompletely constituted transfers?

Trusts Law

Answer both parts which are equally weighted.
1. “An intention (even a fervent desire) to give, no matter how clearly expressed and repeated, is not enough; the donor must also do everything ‘necessary to be done’ as stated in Milroy v Lord and applied by the Court of Appeal in Re Rose” P. Luxton ‘In search of perfection: the Re Rose Rule rationale’ [2012] Cony 70, 74-5

Critically analyze this statement. Does this reflect the current state of the law on incompletely constituted transfers? Should it?

Critically analyze this statement. Does this reflect the current state of the law on incompletely constituted transfers?
Scroll to top