Using the Supreme Court’s ruling, state why the right was necessary to be incorporated into the states. How has the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the right changed since its incorporation and why?

ASSIGNMENT

Discussion Question:What are the limits of Search and Seizure

Analyze the Supreme Court’s ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, Mapp v. Ohio. and TLO v. New Jersey. What “statement” is the court making about the “collection of evidence.?”

Why did the Supreme Court “lower” the standard in TLO? What is the search standard in a public school?

How does the Terry Stop “link” with the standards in the cases above?

PART3: Cases by Amendment may be found below.

B.3.2.2 First Amendment-Freedom of Religion – Case Law

B.3.2.3 First Amendment-Freedoms of Speech and Expression – Case Law

B.3.2.4 First Amendment– Freedom of the Press-Case Law

B.3.2.5 Second Amendment- Right to Bear Arms – Case Law

B.3.2.6 Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights – Case Law

B.3.2.7 Eighth Amendment- Right against Cruel and Unusual Punishment – Case Law

B.3.2.8 Right to Privacy – Case Law

Discussion Question:

Choose a case and a right that has been brought into the states via the 14th Amendment and comment on the following:

Using the Supreme Court’s ruling, state why the right was necessary to be incorporated into the states.

How has the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the right changed since its incorporation and why? (Warren Court to Rehnquist/Robert’s Court)

THE PREVIOUS IS Example of a case and a right – Mapp v. Ohio establishes the Exclusionary Rule which blocks the use of evidence improperly obtained by police in a trial.

 

Using the Supreme Court’s ruling, state why the right was necessary to be incorporated into the states. How has the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the right changed since its incorporation and why?
Scroll to top