Review the United States Supreme Court decision in Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987). Then explain should this evidence be suppressed? Why or Why not?

Maryland v. Garrison

Review the United States Supreme Court decision in Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987). After reviewing that decision, write an original post that analyzes the following factual scenario:

A warrant specifies a search for Marijuana and other drugs in the second-floor dwelling of a yellow and red house located at 315 Anderson Street in the City of Lynchburg, Virginia. When the police arrive, they see that the house’s second floor is divided into two separate apartments, one marked “A” and one marked “B.” The police search both apartments and find Marijuana in both.

Should this evidence be suppressed? Why or Why not?

Does your answer change from a Christian worldview perspective?

Besides the rule of law, is your answer the same when applying Biblical principles? Based on what you have studied, what level of evidence is needed to make the search or seizure legal?

Cite the scholarly source in Bluebook format. Below is assistance on how to cite a book in Bluebook format

Bluebook Resource:

Bluebook Resources

Review the United States Supreme Court decision in Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987). Then explain should this evidence be suppressed? Why or Why not?
Scroll to top